Florida’s dangerous gambit on childhood vaccinations

Stop Vaccinations Of Children. Doctor holding syringe, refusing mother patient saying no and showing hand stop sign gesture with palm, holding baby on hands. Coronavirus vaccine, focus on needle

The announcement by Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo that he will seek the elimination of mandated vaccinations for school-aged children grabbed national headlines and sent shockwaves across the state. If such a proposal were enacted, Florida would become the first state to remove requirements for diseases that once devastated communities before vaccines brought them under control.

Supporters frame the proposal as an issue of “medical freedom,” parental rights, and bodily autonomy. Dr. Ladapo even likened mandatory vaccinations to slavery—an analogy both reckless and deeply offensive to the descendants of enslaved Africans. Invoking trauma in a debate about public health trivializes generations of suffering.

Yet beyond rhetoric, the science is undeniable. Even President Trump and Florida Senator Rick Scott distanced themselves, recognizing that confusing ideology with immunization is a dangerous proposition—especially for children.

The United States has long recognized vaccines as a vital safeguard. In 1855, Massachusetts became the first to require smallpox vaccinations for schoolchildren. In 1905, the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts upheld state authority to enforce vaccination laws. Later, in Zucht v. King, the Court affirmed that schools could require vaccinations for attendance. Together, these rulings confirmed  the collective good of public health outweighs individual objections when it comes to stopping the spread of deadly diseases.

It is also critical to note that Florida already provides parental choice through medical and religious exemptions. In fact, in Miami-Dade County Public Schools 7,366 exemptions were filed in 2023–2024, 7,223 in 2024–2025, and 5,890 have already been filed this school year. These pathways exist. A full repeal is not about expanding freedom—it is about dismantling a system that has protected generations of children.

And importantly, while Dr. Ladapo has announced his intentions, any change to existing law would have to come from the Florida Legislature, which reconvenes in January 2026. His comments, while headline-grabbing, are not self-executing.

The risks of repeal are real. Texas recently experienced a measles outbreak, proof that vaccine-preventable diseases can return when coverage declines. By contrast, Miami-Dade County—Florida’s largest school district—has not had a vaccine-preventable outbreak in nine years, a testament to the effectiveness of mandates.

Eliminating requirements would erode herd immunity, the protection that shields infants, the elderly, and those medically unable to receive vaccines. Without it, classrooms will be vulnerable to diseases long thought consigned to history.

Polls show strong support for mandates: 81% of parents nationally and 82% in Florida favor them. Even within the Republican Party, leaders such as Senator Rick Scott have opposed repeal, noting that exemptions already exist. Representative Lois Frankel called the plan “reckless and dangerous,” while pediatricians warn it could create a “perfect storm” for outbreaks.

Florida’s proposal is not progress. The U.S. has long recognized vaccinations as a cornerstone of public health. Florida already allows exemptions. To dismantle the entire system would not make the state a beacon of freedom—it would make it a testing ground for preventable disease.

Now is the time to stand up and speak out. The legislature must reject attempts to repeal requirements. Silence would not be neutrality—it would be complicity in placing ideology above science and politics above public safety.

True freedom is the ability to live in healthy communities. That is what vaccines provide—and what Florida must not risk taking away.

Author